All topicsTake the quiz
PartyVote.nz

Digital rights: where NZ parties stand in 2026

Online safety, especially for young people, is a new area of policy debate.

“Social media companies should be required to block users under 16.”

Australia passed a law banning under-16s from major social media platforms. A similar member's bill has been proposed in New Zealand.

  • ACTStrongly disagree

    ACT said it would use its agree-to-disagree clause to vote against the under-16 ban, arguing it would not work. Source

  • GRNDisagree

    The Greens oppose National's under-16 ban, arguing platforms should instead be regulated to remove harmful content for all users. Source

  • LABAgree

    Labour backed the under-16 ban bill at first reading, while wanting a stronger regulator and safety-by-design focus rather than age limits alone. Source

  • NATStrongly agree

    National introduced a bill requiring platforms to take reasonable steps to keep under-16s off, with large fines, and plans to progress it after the election. Source

  • NZFStrongly disagree

    Winston Peters said NZ First would never support the under-16 ban, warning that enforcement would require digital ID or VPN restrictions. Source

  • TPMNeutral

    UnconfirmedNo clear public position found; reporting noted Te Pāti Māori had not announced a stance and its voters were split. Source

  • OPPNeutral

    UnconfirmedNo public position found. Opportunity's digital policy covers privacy, cyber security and AI rights but not age limits for social media. Source